The Planned Parenthood Action Fund endorsed President Obama for re-election today and released a new ad attacking Republican candidate Mitt Romney for his views on women’s health care.
“Mitt Romney is out of touch and wrong for women,” the ad intones. (View the ad after the jump.)
Cecile Richards, president of the group, appeared on Morning Joe Wednesday to discuss the issue.
“What you’re seeing with this ad demonstrates what Mitt Romney has said he's going to do about women’s health care — get rid of Planned Parenthood, end the national family planning program that provides healthcare to 5 million women,” she said. “I think that’s why we’re seeing the kind of gender gap we’re seeing in this race.”
Romney has said in the past that he would “get rid" of Planned Parenthood and eliminate funding for the Title X Family Planning program that provides family planning, including contraceptives, and related preventative health services to low-income families through a network of independent clinics, faith-based organizations, and community health centers. Title X was enacted in in 1970 – by Republican president Richard Nixon.
Citing past Republican support for such programs, as well as Planned Parenthood, which was cofounded by Mrs. Barry Goldwater, Richards called it “astonishing to see Mitt Romney take positions that are so extreme.”
Legendary investigative journalist Carl Bernstein, also a guest on the show, labeled the ad “terrific.”
“It shows Romney at his opportunistic worst,” he said.
Conservative host of the show Joe Scarborough questioned Richards’ on whether it is reasonable to expect pro-life Americans to agree with Romney that Planned Parenthood does not deserve federal funding given that it provides abortions in some locations.
“Do you understand why some Americans would not want their tax dollars going to an organization that provides abortion services? Other Americans wouldn't want their tax dollars going to the NRA or pro-life groups,” he said.
“Well of course tax dollars do go to pro-life groups. The important thing is at Planned Parenthood we provide health care to 1 in 5 women in America. The vast majority of our services are preventive health care,” Richards countered. “All the money that Mr. Romney that wants to get rid of…is for preventative care, for family planning.”
“Do you call abortions preventative care? What’s your definition of preventative care?,” Scarborough pressed.
“No. More than 90% of our services are cancer screenings, birth control services, well-women checkups,” Richards said. “Birth control is the best way to prevent the need for abortion. No federal funding in this country goes toward abortion services, hasn’t for decades.”
Richards makes two excellent points here that I want to highlight. One is the fact that yes, federal funds go to pro-life groups. The Catholic Church is a great example, possibly the largest pro-life organization in the world, and yet it has access to federal funds – as do many religious organizations and other nonprofit, charitable groups. Those funds go toward helping the church do its good works and provide excellent social services.
The second fact is that no federal funding goes toward abortion services in this country. Planned Parenthood cannot use any of the federal support it receives for aiding a woman who requests an abortion, just like the Catholic Church cannot use federal funds to proselytize.
So why don’t we see pro-choice supporters out there protesting federal funds aiding and abetting pro-life groups? Because it’s about supporting personal choice.



Good for planned parenthood - It's about time they take a stand and shove mitts words down his throat !! mitts mouth Will be and has been - his downfall - I'm sure that when he see's this - he will deny that he ever said it !!! Obama / Biden 2012 !!
I don't have a problem with Planned Parenthood as a concept but I find it very disturbing that a federally funded program has over a million dollars to spend attacking a political candidate.
Why does a close to bankrupt federal government fund a program that spends that kind of money, not on the services it is supposed to provide, but on a political ad campaign? Something is very wrong with this.
Excuse me? PP may not defend itself and its good works against the right wing bombing campaign? one in five women in America depends on PP for preventive health care. What are 20% of our female population supposed to do if Mittens shuts PP down. Oh, right, abstain from all sexual activity. Let's see how their husbands like that.
I agree with DanielWebster. As long as Planned Parenthood is spending money attacking a political candidate instead of poor women's health needs, they don't have my support. I lost a lot of respect for the organization when I saw that ad, since it's not just an inappropriate use of funds but is hugely misleading. No candidate in his right mind (including Romney) opposes cancer screenings, birth control, etc.--the issue is whether those who cannot afford certain procedures should be helped by private charities or by the government. (News flash: birth control is very cheap and easily available.) Romney does disagree with Roe v Wade but has been clear that states should decide on abortion rights. Overturning Roe v Wade (which is not going to happen) is not something a president could decide anyway; the judiciary does. If he becomes president he could nominate a justice to fill a Supreme Court vacancy, if there is one, but any nominee would have to be confirmed by the Senate, one of the many checks and balances in our system. A radical anti-choice justice is not going to get confirmed--most of us support Roe v Wade, and conservatives know it.