By using the House Oversight Committee as a platform for Romney 2012, Rep. Darrell Issa is helping to cover up the executive branch's bad behavior.
Today's debate in the House Oversight Committee over whether to hold Eric Holder in contempt of Congress is, first and foremost, a campaign season stunt. That's not a statement about the merits of investigating the ATF's now-defunct Fast and Furious program, a boondoggle that certainly deserves official inquiry. But committee chair Darrell Issa—who is, coincidentally, a Republican—has gone well out of his way to showboat for the C-SPAN cameras, publicly insult the Attorney General, and bring things to a head quickly enough that he'd have suitable pretext for holding an unprecedented contempt hearing. Even after Obama asserted executive privilege over the documents Issa's demanding, he steamrolled ahead.
By such naked political maneuvering, Issa has turned the whole Fast and Furious story into one of pure politics. The story on every cable channel and in every major newspaper no longer has anything to do with what the ATF and Justice Department may have actually done; instead, it's all about House Republicans versus the White House. Issa has relegated any actual wrongdoing to the status of a footnote.
That's emblematic of how thoroughly Issa and his committee have abdicated their oversight responsibility under this administration. Because the committee has become, in essence, a Republican campaign platform, it has lost the legitimacy to conduct serious investigations into administration malfeasance. What's worse, it has ignored the Obama administration's most serious wrongdoing, because it happens to be wrongdoing that Republicans support.
An Oversight Committee that was genuinely interested in holding the Obama administration accountable would investigate:
- the NSA's domestic surveillance activities
- the Justice Department's unprecedented war on whistleblowers
- the CIA's collaboration with the NYPD on a domestic spying program targeted at Muslim communities
- the NSC's secret "kill list"
- allegations that the United States is still complicit in torture
- the CIA's "signature" drone strikes
- the DEA's pseudo-military operations in Honduras
- America's secret war in Yemen
- America's secret cyber-war with Iran
- the alleged Secret PATRIOT Act
Many of those stories positively dwarf what we know about the Fast and Furious program. But, of course, a Republican campaign organ would be reluctant to investigate most of them. After all, the Bush administration also engaged in undeclared wars, prisoner mistreatment, domestic surveillance, and so on. What's more, the Republican Party still supports those programs. A hypothetical President Romney would likely extend them even further.
So, ironically, the House Oversight Committee has nearly completely given up on oversight. Instead, by dwelling on short-term partisan advantage, it has become tacitly complicit in executive branch overreach and abuse.
But what did you expect? That's what happens when political parties mobilize all of their functionaries to become round-the-clock campaigners. It's what happens when every government institution becomes a potential platform for the advancement of your party's short-term interests. Checks and balances break down, and what we're left with is a cynical, anti-democratic power struggle between competing interests.



Powerful Op-Ed! I agree with the structure of the argument, but, am a tad hesidant about the, identified, proper targets. Maybe a bit of a fine tooth comb would clarify the specific complaints. This is not to deny that there are issues, just questioning which are worthy of exam, by a political House of Representatives.
Given that the Congress has constantly skirted the specific issue of supplying arms to the drug lords. It is one thing to ignore the hundreds of thousands of weapons delivered to with the support and guidance of second amendment rights, and it quite another to set up a series of sting operations using the AFT. The Congress has hobbled the AFT, underfunded the ATF and above all this reduced this agency to a pathetic shadow of a law enforcement agency. These sting operations were poorly thought out, poorly manned, left stranded by of all things Congressional Oversight, and this fact was obvious from the get go.
Congress would be better described as being complicit in the drug trade, spending wildly on advanced technology to win campaign contributions, spending stupidly by pawning useless military equipment, handing police new toys to again win campaign support. These things that Congress can do, and did do, have distracted from state police, from the ATF from the FBI, lessening the pressure on the drug trade. If we required lobbyists to drug be tested, and for that matter half the bankers, financers, and stock brokers then after doing the same test on Congress we should be able to understand that Mexico drug money laundered at casinos could enter the political system. The connection of this drug funding lever to at times to tighten law enforcement to improve drug profitability and alternately to weaken defund investigation police efforts to allow more drug money to be laundered.
The public cannot see that those same financial law changes that gave bank and financial houses permission to crash the economy.
The House cannot see beyond its peripatetic and narrowness to the enlighten interest of the citizenry who either voted them in, forgot to vote the out and did vote altogether, as if it did not cost $8.5 billion dollars each and every year.
This Congress is a pathetic disgrace, baby and bath water; it has got to go, "Citizens United" being sent to the damned.
When Obama is re elected with super majorities in both houses, hopefully he'll stop all these "terror" related suppression's of our civil rights and restore the United State's integrity. And apologize to the rest of the world for our surly behavior going back a hundred years