Widespread drought is currently ravaging 64% of America's contiguous 48 states, Chris Hayes reported on Sunday's Up w/ Chris Hayes. It's had a significant effect on crop production in the United States, and particularly on crop production in small, non-factory farms. Bryn Bird, a second-generation Ohio farmer, appeared on the program to explain how the drought—and a rapidly changing climate in general—have affected her family business.
"This drought, this year, has really affected us," Bird said. "We had our first three plantings of our sweet corn failure. ... That's like $40,000 crop loss, and to a small family farm, that's a ton of produce. The bigger issue is also we, being especially a crop farm, don't have the same types of insurance that commodity farmers do, and so we're an under-insured and uninsured industry. And so we don't have any way of regaining those losses.
It wasn't just the drought that was devastating her crops, she added. "Also, the heat. That's something people are not talking about. We talk about the drought, the lack of water, but the heat, we're in extreme heat. 105, 107 [degree] days—that doesn't happen in our area of Ohio. And corn, and all produce, can only grow during certain temperature ranges."
As climate change worsens, the consequences for global food prices could be staggering; and that would have wide-ranging and unpredictable consequences. "A world of food volatility is a world of political volatility," Hayes said.



Where do you find helpless victims like this? Ohio got warm this year, but the overall temperature trend is down. Did you even bother to look, journalist? Did you think farmers thought weather was certain?
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/07/04/ohio-july-temperatures-plummeting-2009-was-the-coldest-on-record/
Droughts happen. Care to look at PMDI for Ohio? I didn't think so, because if you had, you would not have made claims contradictory to the data. Here it is:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/time-series/index.php?parameter=pmdi&month=6&year=2012&filter=1&state=33&div=0
Does that look unusual in any way? If anything, the weather is getting better as the temperature drops! Droughts have been less common. This one is quite run-of-the- mill. Yet MSNBC implies that bad weather in Ohio = climate change, when in fact the climate is doing the opposite of what the witch burners suggest, with cooling temperatures and more abundant (and more consistent) precipitation. So which does MSNBC go with? Alarmism instead of facts. Again.
Has MSNBC run anything remotely scientifically accurate in the last 12 months regarding climate? If so, I would like to see it. Please post a link.
Why has MSNBC taken such an anti-science position on climate?